TOPIC:
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
IDEAS:
I. Introduction
- The argument that wild animals have no place in the 21st century and protecting them is a waste of resources
- The personal stance on this issue
II. Arguments in favor of the statement
- The argument that wild animals are not relevant or necessary in modern society
- The potential for protecting wild animals to divert resources from other human needs or priorities
- The argument that wild animals may pose threats or conflicts with human activities
III. Arguments against the statement
- The value of biodiversity and the importance of preserving ecosystems
- The potential for wild animals to serve as important sources of inspiration, education, and recreation
- The ethical considerations of humans imposing their values on other species
- The potential for protecting wild animals to have positive impacts on human health and the environment
IV. Conclusion
- Recap of main points and personal stance on the issue
- The importance of considering the multiple dimensions of the issue and finding a balanced approach to protecting wild animals.