TOPIC:
Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
IDEAS:
I. Introduction
- The argument that people who have been in prison and become good citizens later are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime
- The personal stance on this issue
II. Arguments in favor of using people who have been in prison as speakers for teenagers
- The potential for these individuals to have first-hand experience and insight into the consequences of crime
- The potential for these individuals to have a powerful personal story that can resonate with teenagers
- The potential for these individuals to serve as role models or examples of redemption
III. Arguments against using people who have been in prison as speakers for teenagers
- The potential for these individuals to be seen as flawed or untrustworthy by teenagers
- The potential for these individuals to be seen as representing a minority or extreme case
- The potential for these individuals to inadvertently glorify or romanticize crime
- The importance of considering the appropriateness or effectiveness of these individuals as speakers based on the specific context and audience
IV. Conclusion
- Recap of main points and personal stance on the issue
- The importance of considering the multiple dimensions of the issue and finding a balanced approach to using people with criminal backgrounds as speakers for teenagers.
Try Essay King AI Essay Correction service and a world of Premium IELTS Material
Explore the All-In-One solution for your IELTS Writing today!
